My dear "Alma Mater"...

I’m on fire jejejeje, because I’ll write two posts in a row so this one is about my faculty, The Faculty of Social Sciences.

The current status of faculty, mmmm, is a bit hard to say because I would need a topic to discuss, I mean, academic or administrative situation, so for this post I will focus on talking about academics. First of all on the academic side I must say that we have been a kind of experiment because we have changed the signatures almost every year, some signatures have been ghosts, where I felt that I haven’t learned anything new, or signatures in where I don’t even need to go classes, signatures whose programs were modified on the fly, or where the teacher didn’t review and even take the exams. That is exactly what would improve, how to join our faculty and teachers how the curriculum is built. The first steps point to the review of curricula for teachers, seeing what they have done along their career, but mostly to know what to expect in this classes, their objectives and working methods. (in that sense, “teacher survey” which it’s done each time at the end of the semester is a good opportunity to know the performance of individual teachers)

Well, in order to solve this situation I definitely cut off teachers who had two bad evaluations in one year so I’ll can keep the educational level of the students of this university and keep teachers with a real vocation to teach.

The benefits of this measures will be a better teaching because a teacher with vocation cans inspire to the students, he can make a difference in his students since he has a vision and an ambition when he accept to teach in this university, specifically, in this faculty.

As I already said marketing teachers and bad teachers must go and leave the spot to the good ones, to the real teachers who aren’t very known in the society and don’t appear very often on the media, but with a condition to do a decent class.